I would like to build a drum machine/metronome
using a BASIC Stamp 2 (maybe later on PICAXE)
which would allow the user to control
the beats per minute (bpm) with a dial/potentiometer.
They could select a value from 1-255
(later I might add a module to display the current value).

I would like the timing to be as accurate enough
to a real clock to be comparable to a real metronome
or drum machine.

This is the main problem, since the BASIC Stamp 2
(and PICAXE models I am considering)
don't have a real time clock (see link/citation below).
Would I need to connect the microcontroller to a
Dallas real time clock to accurately control the timing
or would it be possible to make my own with a
555 timer or other component for less money?

For my purpose the 555 or similar would have to be
accurate enough to measure actual seconds
(or milliseconds? how granular should it be?)
to get real beats per minute.
I have found numerous "555 calculator" pages
(some listed below) which let you enter different
resistor/capacitor values and see what the
time high / time low would be (you can reverse
the math to figure out what R/C values to measure
milliseconds, or 1/100 of a second, or whatever
would be accurate enough).

You can get gold resistors with +/- 5% tolerance,
would this variance throw off the timing?
Furthermore I read that capacitors of the type needed
for the 555 are a lot less tolerant (+/- 20%)
than gold resistors. If this is true, would this
totally throw off the timing? I picture myself having to
buy 100 capacitors and test each one with a meter until
I find the exact value, and even then its capactiance might
change as it ages, making the device not accurate.

Any advice or links to a similar project or good solution would be
most appreciated... The simpler the better : )

Thanks again

----------

Shaun's Basic Stamp II Beginners Page
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/ ... arted.html
Real Time clock (RTC) - Since the Stamp only uses a resonator for its
clock,
it is not accuarate enough to keep track of dates and times.
Resontors usually have a +/- 1% error, that means over a 24 hour
period
error could be close to an hour. But since the Stamp usually only is
working with milli seconds, mirco seconds,and seconds a resonator
does
the job. Real Time Clock can keep track of years, months, weeks,
days,
hours, minutes, and seconds. So as you can see any project that
requires
an accuarate time base then a RTC is what you need. Dallas semi
conductor
make some of the most popular RTC's. http://www.dalsemi.com

555 Calculator
http://freespace.virgin.net/matt.waite/ ... /index.htm

555 Timer Calculator
http://wolfstone.halloweenhost.com/Tech ... rCalc.html

555 Timer Calculator
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepage ... en/555.htm

<mad.scientist.jr@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9c27d683-95c3-4c38-b4b7-fd8b46ca2660@n36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>I would like to build a drum machine/metronome
> using a BASIC Stamp 2 (maybe later on PICAXE)
> which would allow the user to control
> the beats per minute (bpm) with a dial/potentiometer.
> They could select a value from 1-255
> (later I might add a module to display the current value).
>
> I would like the timing to be as accurate enough
> to a real clock to be comparable to a real metronome
> or drum machine.
>

A pic has an internal oscillator which is tunable using an internal
register, giving you about 5% accuracy on the absolute clock speed, which is
suitable for many applications. It changes with temperature, however. You
can also use an external crystal, which will get you to better than 1%,
independent of temperature (at room temp += 10C). Using an external crystal
uses up two pins, but may be what you need. You can also use an external
crystal oscillator, which may have comparable accuracy, but only needs a
single pin input. You can get them in packages where you input 5V and GND,
and get a TTL signal out with the clock.

These will be much cheaper than an RTC chip, most of which's features you
won't need. If you use a dial pot, you won't be able to tune the thing much
more accurately than 5% anyway, I think, so the internal PIC oscillator will
probably be fine.

Regards,
Bob Monsen

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:10:53 -0700 (PDT), mad.scientist.jr@gmail.com
wrote:

>I would like to build a drum machine/metronome
>using a BASIC Stamp 2 (maybe later on PICAXE)
>which would allow the user to control
>the beats per minute (bpm) with a dial/potentiometer.
>They could select a value from 1-255
>(later I might add a module to display the current value).
>
>I would like the timing to be as accurate enough
>to a real clock to be comparable to a real metronome
>or drum machine.
>
>This is the main problem, since the BASIC Stamp 2
>(and PICAXE models I am considering)
>don't have a real time clock (see link/citation below).
>Would I need to connect the microcontroller to a
>Dallas real time clock to accurately control the timing
>or would it be possible to make my own with a
>555 timer or other component for less money?
>
>For my purpose the 555 or similar would have to be
>accurate enough to measure actual seconds
>(or milliseconds? how granular should it be?)
>to get real beats per minute.
>I have found numerous "555 calculator" pages
>(some listed below) which let you enter different
>resistor/capacitor values and see what the
>time high / time low would be (you can reverse
>the math to figure out what R/C values to measure
>milliseconds, or 1/100 of a second, or whatever
>would be accurate enough).
>
>You can get gold resistors with +/- 5% tolerance,
>would this variance throw off the timing?
>Furthermore I read that capacitors of the type needed
>for the 555 are a lot less tolerant (+/- 20%)
>than gold resistors. If this is true, would this
>totally throw off the timing? I picture myself having to
>buy 100 capacitors and test each one with a meter until
>I find the exact value, and even then its capactiance might
>change as it ages, making the device not accurate.
>
>Any advice or links to a similar project or good solution would be
>most appreciated... The simpler the better : )

---
Sorry, but you're completely off base.

What you want to do is program your basic stamp to be an astable
multivibrator with a period which varies according to the user
input.

For example, if your basic stamp has a 1MHz resonator generating the
clock and you want to output 60 beats per minute, then you need to
count up the equivalent of 1 million clocks and generate an output
at that time. Also, if your output's pulsewidth isn't being
generated by an independent internal interrupt driven timer, you'll
need to subtract the width of the output pulse and the times
required for the instructions to generate it from the one million
clocks so that things come out right.

--
JF

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:00:24 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:10:53 -0700 (PDT), mad.scientist.jr@gmail.com
>wrote:
>
>>I would like to build a drum machine/metronome
>>using a BASIC Stamp 2 (maybe later on PICAXE)
>>which would allow the user to control
>>the beats per minute (bpm) with a dial/potentiometer.
>>They could select a value from 1-255
>>(later I might add a module to display the current value).
>>
>>I would like the timing to be as accurate enough
>>to a real clock to be comparable to a real metronome
>>or drum machine.
>>
>>This is the main problem, since the BASIC Stamp 2
>>(and PICAXE models I am considering)
>>don't have a real time clock (see link/citation below).
>>Would I need to connect the microcontroller to a
>>Dallas real time clock to accurately control the timing
>>or would it be possible to make my own with a
>>555 timer or other component for less money?
>>
>>For my purpose the 555 or similar would have to be
>>accurate enough to measure actual seconds
>>(or milliseconds? how granular should it be?)
>>to get real beats per minute.
>>I have found numerous "555 calculator" pages
>>(some listed below) which let you enter different
>>resistor/capacitor values and see what the
>>time high / time low would be (you can reverse
>>the math to figure out what R/C values to measure
>>milliseconds, or 1/100 of a second, or whatever
>>would be accurate enough).
>>
>>You can get gold resistors with +/- 5% tolerance,
>>would this variance throw off the timing?
>>Furthermore I read that capacitors of the type needed
>>for the 555 are a lot less tolerant (+/- 20%)
>>than gold resistors. If this is true, would this
>>totally throw off the timing? I picture myself having to
>>buy 100 capacitors and test each one with a meter until
>>I find the exact value, and even then its capactiance might
>>change as it ages, making the device not accurate.
>>
>>Any advice or links to a similar project or good solution would be
>>most appreciated... The simpler the better : )
>
>---
>Sorry, but you're completely off base.
>
>What you want to do is program your basic stamp to be an astable
>multivibrator with a period which varies according to the user
>input.
>
>For example, if your basic stamp has a 1MHz resonator generating the
>clock and you want to output 60 beats per minute, then you need to
>count up the equivalent of 1 million clocks and generate an output
>at that time. Also, if your output's pulsewidth isn't being
>generated by an independent internal interrupt driven timer, you'll
>need to subtract the width of the output pulse and the times
>required for the instructions to generate it from the one million
>clocks so that things come out right.

---
Oops...

I misread your post, blow mine off.

--
JF

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:10:53 -0700, mad.scientist.jr wrote:
>
> Shaun's Basic Stamp II Beginners Page
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/ ... arted.html
> Real Time clock (RTC) - Since the Stamp only uses a resonator for its
> clock,
> it is not accuarate enough to keep track of dates and times.
> Resontors usually have a +/- 1% error, that means over a 24 hour
> period
> error could be close to an hour.

Well, for one thing, that's more than enough accuracy for what's
essentially a high-end metronome. Remember the "real" metronomes?
They were mechanical!

Or, if you're totally ooky about it, don't use a BASIC Stamp. Use a
micro that can take a crystal. You can get temp-controlled crystals in
an oven that have insane stability and stuff, or you could sync it to
WWV.

Good Luck!
Rich

<mad.scientist.jr@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9c27d683-95c3-4c38-b4b7-fd8b46ca2660@n36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>I would like to build a drum machine/metronome
> using a BASIC Stamp 2 (maybe later on PICAXE)
> which would allow the user to control
> the beats per minute (bpm) with a dial/potentiometer.
> They could select a value from 1-255
> (later I might add a module to display the current value).
>
> I would like the timing to be as accurate enough
> to a real clock to be comparable to a real metronome
> or drum machine.
>
> This is the main problem, since the BASIC Stamp 2
> (and PICAXE models I am considering)
> don't have a real time clock (see link/citation below).
> Would I need to connect the microcontroller to a
> Dallas real time clock to accurately control the timing
> or would it be possible to make my own with a
> 555 timer or other component for less money?
>
> For my purpose the 555 or similar would have to be
> accurate enough to measure actual seconds
> (or milliseconds? how granular should it be?)
> to get real beats per minute.
> I have found numerous "555 calculator" pages
> (some listed below) which let you enter different
> resistor/capacitor values and see what the
> time high / time low would be (you can reverse
> the math to figure out what R/C values to measure
> milliseconds, or 1/100 of a second, or whatever
> would be accurate enough).
>
> You can get gold resistors with +/- 5% tolerance,
> would this variance throw off the timing?
> Furthermore I read that capacitors of the type needed
> for the 555 are a lot less tolerant (+/- 20%)
> than gold resistors. If this is true, would this
> totally throw off the timing? I picture myself having to
> buy 100 capacitors and test each one with a meter until
> I find the exact value, and even then its capactiance might
> change as it ages, making the device not accurate.
>
> Any advice or links to a similar project or good solution would be
> most appreciated... The simpler the better : )
>
> Thanks again
>

If you don't use the PLL(jitter of +-2%) then you probably have about 1%
jitter(which is the real problem except for drift). The clock has about 5%
inaccuracy but you can calibrate that out or get a more accurate clock.

1% jitter using the internal 8Mhz clock is +-2bpm at around 200bpm. This
isn't acceptable but you can use it anyways for development(its not bad
though for starters). Its very easy to use a more precise external clock so
its no big deal.

Also, Timer1 can use an external clock so if you use this for your timing
you can easily hook up a better clock later on to get more precision.

The point being is that the clock, at this point in development, doesn't
matter. The PIC is good enough at this point to do everything that is needed
and its very simple to make it better.

Except of course if you do use timer1 and plan on using an external clock
you need to keep the secondary osc pin free... although theres no real point
when you can just use that for the primary clock.

So my suggestion is you go ahead and develop the software and hardware and
then after you get a prototype you can worry about getting a more precise
oscillator. (if you do any layout you can lay out for some clock and/or
clock conditioner and then its just a matter of configuring the pic). This
is really a non issue so go ahead and get with it!

mad.scientist.jr@gmail.com wrote:

>I would like to build a drum machine/metronome
>using a BASIC Stamp 2 (maybe later on PICAXE)

You might want to start with a BasicX-24 instead of a
BASIC Stamp 2 [ http://www.basicx.com/ ] It is superior
to the Basic Stamp in many ways, one of which is having
a stable crystal oscillator.

--
Guy Macon
<http://www.guymacon.com/>

"Rich Grise" <rich@example.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.03.12.00.18.06.843954@example.net...
>
> Or, if you're totally ooky about it, don't use a BASIC Stamp. Use a
> micro that can take a crystal. You can get temp-controlled crystals in
> an oven that have insane stability and stuff, or you could sync it to
> WWV.
>

Basic stamps can't use external crystals? I didn't know that. Useful bit of
information.

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:35:01 -0700, "Bob Monsen" <rcmonsen@gmail.com>
wrote:

>"Rich Grise" <rich@example.net> wrote in message
>news:pan.2008.03.12.00.18.06.843954@example.net...
>>
>> Or, if you're totally ooky about it, don't use a BASIC Stamp. Use a
>> micro that can take a crystal. You can get temp-controlled crystals in
>> an oven that have insane stability and stuff, or you could sync it to
>> WWV.
>>
>
>Basic stamps can't use external crystals? I didn't know that. Useful bit of
>information.

I guess you could unsolder the SMT ceramic resonator and replace it
with capacitors and a crystal, but they've got so many other
disadvantages I would not recommend it.

In this case, a microcontroller with a hardware timer that can toggle
an external pin (called the CCP module on Microchip's parts) is called
for, as well as the crystal timebase.

The OP may be able to find a suitable chip that has a free C compiler
such as PICC Lite, or some other language of his/her choosing.

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com