|
It is currently 19 May 2012, 17:30
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 24 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
phaeton
|
 Electrical Safety
Hello again from the dungeon...
As I start to get into building line-driven power supplies and such, where should I start REALLY being careful? 40V? 60V? 110V? I realize that current is what does the damage, but you don't have it without voltage. (I also realize that other factors will factor).
What is the realistic neighborhood of where I shouldn't be grabbing wires and/or switching out caps or resistors in a live circuit?
The physics and shop teacher in HS talked about 110 AC Line current like it would knock you dead instantly. An electrician that was installing a 208v-->480v step up transformer said "110 won't hurt you at all. It's just enough to scare you a little bit".
I'm not about to strip a power cord and bite down on it, obviously, but he's not the first to say 'I've been bit by 110 a bunch of times. It's no big deal'..
Thoughts?
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:03 |
|
 |
|
David
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
On Aug 14, 11:01 am, phaeton <blahbleh...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hello again from the dungeon... > > As I start to get into building line-driven power supplies and such, > where should I start REALLY being careful? 40V? 60V? 110V? I realize > that current is what does the damage, but you don't have it without > voltage. (I also realize that other factors will factor). > > What is the realistic neighborhood of where I shouldn't be grabbing > wires and/or switching out caps or resistors in a live circuit?
There should be no need to be doing that at all. But if you want a ballpark - anything mains powered (except plugpacks which are ok).
> The physics and shop teacher in HS talked about 110 AC Line current > like it would knock you dead instantly. An electrician that was > installing a 208v-->480v step up transformer said "110 won't hurt you > at all. It's just enough to scare you a little bit". > > I'm not about to strip a power cord and bite down on it, obviously, > but he's not the first to say 'I've been bit by 110 a bunch of times. > It's no big deal'.. > > Thoughts?
If you don't know the answers to these questions then you shouldn't be playing with mains powered stuff at all. The mains can kill you.
Generally speaking, anything over 50V or so is potentially dangerous and should be treated as such.
Dave.
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:03 |
|
 |
|
DJ
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
IIRC, the cutoff for "safe" is somewhere around 60v, which determined the rail voltage for telephone switches or something.
I've gotten bitten by 120v before. It hurt, but caused no permanent damage, not that I'd want to do it again. "Safe" is different than "I got away with it" too - a little current in the wrong place is fatal, especially if it has to cross your chest to get to ground.
As for lower voltages, I've destroyed ICs by inserting bypass caps without discharging them first. Safe for me, not safe for the chips.
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:03 |
|
 |
|
John
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:01:30 -0700, phaeton <blahbleh666@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Hello again from the dungeon... > >As I start to get into building line-driven power supplies and such, >where should I start REALLY being careful? 40V? 60V? 110V? I realize >that current is what does the damage, but you don't have it without >voltage. (I also realize that other factors will factor). > >What is the realistic neighborhood of where I shouldn't be grabbing >wires and/or switching out caps or resistors in a live circuit? > >The physics and shop teacher in HS talked about 110 AC Line current >like it would knock you dead instantly. An electrician that was >installing a 208v-->480v step up transformer said "110 won't hurt you >at all. It's just enough to scare you a little bit". > >I'm not about to strip a power cord and bite down on it, obviously, >but he's not the first to say 'I've been bit by 110 a bunch of times. >It's no big deal'.. > > > > >Thoughts?
48 volts.
John
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:03 |
|
 |
|
don
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
In <1187053290.335795.254830@g12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, phaeton said >Hello again from the dungeon... > >As I start to get into building line-driven power supplies and such, >where should I start REALLY being careful? 40V? 60V? 110V? I realize >that current is what does the damage, but you don't have it without >voltage. (I also realize that other factors will factor). > >What is the realistic neighborhood of where I shouldn't be grabbing >wires and/or switching out caps or resistors in a live circuit? > >The physics and shop teacher in HS talked about 110 AC Line current >like it would knock you dead instantly. An electrician that was >installing a 208v-->480v step up transformer said "110 won't hurt you >at all. It's just enough to scare you a little bit". > >I'm not about to strip a power cord and bite down on it, obviously, >but he's not the first to say 'I've been bit by 110 a bunch of times. >It's no big deal'.. I think do some bit of research into body count or annual body count as a function of voltage. 110-120 volts AC is "up-there", maybe 2nd place to industrial 460-480 volts AC or so. Body count of 110-120 volts AC exceeds that from 440-480 volt AC range on US Navy ships among those where both of these voltage ranges are present. I suspect that 110-120 volts AC at 50-60 Hz has a high body count due to high carelessness due to survival rate of shocks from 110-120 volts AC 50-60 Hz being high, though short of 100%. - Don Klipstein ( don@misty.com)
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:03 |
|
 |
|
NoSpam
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:01:30 -0700, phaeton <blahbleh666@hotmail.com> wrote: <snip> >I'm not about to strip a power cord and bite down on it, obviously, >but he's not the first to say 'I've been bit by 110 a bunch of times. >It's no big deal'.. Sorta like the drunk: "I've driven home from the bar while totally sloshed a bunch of times. It's no big deal." Or the guy who never wears his seat belt. Or the cyclist or biker who never wears a helmet. It only has to be a "big deal" one time. But even at low voltages, there is a good reason to switch things off: If you work on live equipment, sooner or later you will slip and short something and let the magic smoke out. (Ask me how I know this!) <g> Best regards, Bob Masta D A Q A R T A Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis http://www.daqarta.comScope, Spectrum, Spectrogram, Signal Generator Science with your sound card!
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:03 |
|
 |
|
Chuck
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
phaeton wrote: > Hello again from the dungeon... > > As I start to get into building line-driven power supplies and such, > where should I start REALLY being careful? 40V? 60V? 110V? I realize > that current is what does the damage, but you don't have it without > voltage. (I also realize that other factors will factor). > > What is the realistic neighborhood of where I shouldn't be grabbing > wires and/or switching out caps or resistors in a live circuit? > > The physics and shop teacher in HS talked about 110 AC Line current > like it would knock you dead instantly. An electrician that was > installing a 208v-->480v step up transformer said "110 won't hurt you > at all. It's just enough to scare you a little bit". > > I'm not about to strip a power cord and bite down on it, obviously, > but he's not the first to say 'I've been bit by 110 a bunch of times. > It's no big deal'.. > > > > > Thoughts? > I was surprised by some of the answers given. First off, disregard the notion that 120 volts can't kill you. The effect it has on you depends on many factors, such as whether the current passes through your chest (i.e., heart), and how much current passes through your body. The latter depends, for example, on whether you are an older tradesperson with calloused, dry fingers. But if you have soft, moist fingers and contact high enough voltages (definitely less than 120 volts), you may easily pass enough current to kill. The point here is not that you need to measure your skin moisture, but rather that you need to have a good understanding of Ohm's law and why someone might escape direct "contact" with lethal voltages. Statistics show that even among experienced industrial electricians, the greater cause of injury and death is the consequence of massive muscle contraction causing falls from ladders, or being thown violently into some deadly object. I would try to learn a great deal more about the dangers of working with high voltages before attempting to do so. Do a Google search on some of these issues and consider soliciting opinions from the deceased to balance those available from the fortunate!  Chuck ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:03 |
|
 |
|
Nobody
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:01:30 -0700, phaeton wrote:
> As I start to get into building line-driven power supplies and such, > where should I start REALLY being careful? 40V? 60V? 110V? I realize > that current is what does the damage, but you don't have it without > voltage. (I also realize that other factors will factor). > > What is the realistic neighborhood of where I shouldn't be grabbing > wires and/or switching out caps or resistors in a live circuit?
Bear in mind that it isn't just a case of being directly harmed by the electricity itself. Even 50V can give you enough of a "surprise" that you reflexively pull your arm away and ram a soldering iron into your face or send a tank of FeCl3/NaOH/etc flying.
> The physics and shop teacher in HS talked about 110 AC Line current > like it would knock you dead instantly. An electrician that was > installing a 208v-->480v step up transformer said "110 won't hurt you > at all. It's just enough to scare you a little bit". > > I'm not about to strip a power cord and bite down on it, obviously, > but he's not the first to say 'I've been bit by 110 a bunch of times. > It's no big deal'..
I've been bit by 240 a bunch of times (in the UK, where 240V is 240V above ground, not +/-120V). At least one of those was the "bad" case: right hand on the live, left hand resting on the grounded chassis. Mind you, that was when I was 16-17, young and healthy; the consequences might be a bit more serious these days.
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:03 |
|
 |
|
Dr.
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
> I've been bit by 240 a bunch of times (in the UK, where 240V is 240V > above ground, not +/-120V).
Ah, we do tend to forget that fact (it's not 240 a.g. here in the USA). But touching 480 3-phase (what's that a.g.?) "got my attention". -- Dr. Leonard. H. McCoy "I'm a *doctor*, Jim, not a *magician*!"
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:03 |
|
 |
|
Tim
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
Bob Masta wrote: > On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:01:30 -0700, phaeton <blahbleh666@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > <snip> >> I'm not about to strip a power cord and bite down on it, obviously, >> but he's not the first to say 'I've been bit by 110 a bunch of times. >> It's no big deal'.. > > Sorta like the drunk: "I've driven home from the bar while totally > sloshed a bunch of times. It's no big deal." > > Or the guy who never wears his seat belt. > > Or the cyclist or biker who never wears a helmet. > > It only has to be a "big deal" one time. > > But even at low voltages, there is a good reason > to switch things off: If you work on live equipment, > sooner or later you will slip and short something and > let the magic smoke out. (Ask me how I know this!) <g> > And if it has high current capability it can have nasty interactions with jewelry. By brother bears a scar on his wrist from a metal watch band that got shorted (thanks to a wrench) between a truck battery and ground. That was just 12 volts, but it stripped the skin off his wrist underneath the segmented metal watch band. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.comDo you need to implement control loops in software? "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" gives you just what it says. See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:03 |
|
 |
|
spambait
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
In article <0001HW.C2E7341B02B0B998F04076C8@news.sf.sbcglobal.net>, bones@ncc1701.mil wrote: >> I've been bit by 240 a bunch of times (in the UK, where 240V is 240V >> above ground, not +/-120V). > >Ah, we do tend to forget that fact (it's not 240 a.g. here in the USA). But >touching 480 3-phase (what's that a.g.?) "got my attention". Ours are still 240V line-to-line, though -- grabbing one hot lead of a US 240V circuit in each hand is every bit as dangerous as grabbing the hot lead of a UK 240V circuit in one hand and the neutral in the other. -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:04 |
|
 |
|
Michael
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
"Anonymous." wrote: > > "Chuck" <no.spam@no.spam.at.all> wrote in message > news:1187101209_531@sp12lax.superfeed.net... > > First off, disregard the notion that 120 volts can't kill you. The effect > > it has on you depends on many factors, such as whether the current passes > > through your chest (i.e., heart), and how much current passes through your > > body. The latter depends, for example, on whether you are an older > > tradesperson with calloused, dry fingers. > > Here in Britland we have an old saying, > > "It's volts that jolts > But mills that kills"
In the US, it is:
There are some old electricians, There are some bold electricians, But there are no old, bold electricians.
-- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85.
Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:04 |
|
 |
|
Sjouke
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
DJ Delorie wrote: > IIRC, the cutoff for "safe" is somewhere around 60v, which determined > the rail voltage for telephone switches or something. > > I've gotten bitten by 120v before. It hurt, but caused no permanent > damage, not that I'd want to do it again. "Safe" is different than "I > got away with it" too - a little current in the wrong place is fatal, > especially if it has to cross your chest to get to ground. > > As for lower voltages, I've destroyed ICs by inserting bypass caps > without discharging them first. Safe for me, not safe for the chips. Just today i was bitten by 240v twice. As long as you dont actually grab hold of a wire, its fells and acts like a warning to to stay away from the hot wires. Any time I have to work on a hot circuit, I have learned not to grab things, and use proper insulated tools. And any time you let your attention slip a little bit, you get a stinging lesson to re-train your reflexes.  It also sometimes causes nice sparks. Oh, and make sure your footware is isolating you from ground.
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:04 |
|
 |
|
Jamie
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
phaeton wrote: > Hello again from the dungeon... > > As I start to get into building line-driven power supplies and such, > where should I start REALLY being careful? 40V? 60V? 110V? I realize > that current is what does the damage, but you don't have it without > voltage. (I also realize that other factors will factor). > > What is the realistic neighborhood of where I shouldn't be grabbing > wires and/or switching out caps or resistors in a live circuit? > > The physics and shop teacher in HS talked about 110 AC Line current > like it would knock you dead instantly. An electrician that was > installing a 208v-->480v step up transformer said "110 won't hurt you > at all. It's just enough to scare you a little bit". > > I'm not about to strip a power cord and bite down on it, obviously, > but he's not the first to say 'I've been bit by 110 a bunch of times. > It's no big deal'.. > > > > > Thoughts? > Here in the states, 50 Volts or more, you're in a whole new world. -- "I'm never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken" Real Programmers Do things like this. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:04 |
|
 |
|
Rich
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:01:30 -0700, phaeton wrote:
> Hello again from the dungeon... > > As I start to get into building line-driven power supplies and such, > where should I start REALLY being careful?
Now.
Good Luck! Rich
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:04 |
|
 |
|
Rich
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:13:32 +0000, Bob Masta wrote: > On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:01:30 -0700, phaeton <blahbleh666@hotmail.com> > <snip> >>I'm not about to strip a power cord and bite down on it, obviously, >>but he's not the first to say 'I've been bit by 110 a bunch of times. >>It's no big deal'.. > > Sorta like the drunk: "I've driven home from the bar while totally > sloshed a bunch of times. It's no big deal."
Well, if he can drive safely, it's not.
> Or the guy who never wears his seat belt.
That's trivial: Look in front of the car. If there's something there, don't go there.
> Or the cyclist or biker who never wears a helmet.
Oh, feh. This is just too much. A helmet on a freaking BICYCLE?
You're supposed to learn how to ride the bike so that you don't fall on your head.
Cheers! Rich
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:04 |
|
 |
|
don
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
In article <pan.2007.08.15.02.08.21.80847@example.net>, Rich Grise wrote: >On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:13:32 +0000, Bob Masta wrote: >> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:01:30 -0700, phaeton <blahbleh666@hotmail.com> >> <snip> >>>I'm not about to strip a power cord and bite down on it, obviously, >>>but he's not the first to say 'I've been bit by 110 a bunch of times. >>>It's no big deal'.. >> >> Sorta like the drunk: "I've driven home from the bar while totally >> sloshed a bunch of times. It's no big deal." > >Well, if he can drive safely, it's not. > >> Or the guy who never wears his seat belt. > >That's trivial: Look in front of the car. If there's something there, >don't go there. > >> Or the cyclist or biker who never wears a helmet. > >Oh, feh. This is just too much. A helmet on a freaking BICYCLE? > >You're supposed to learn how to ride the bike so that you don't fall >on your head. Since I do a lot of bike riding for delivering delivered restaurant food, I have to ride bikes while being a restaurant worker. That is my "day job" and I am an engineer as my side job since I have some need to make my living from my brain only about 15 hours per week, so I have to make my living from my feet quite a bit. Restaurant workers and those juggling 2 lines of work due to brain load issues should be expected to have "senior moments" at any age. I expect that most who do major work or major commuting with a bicycle are only a step or 2 better off - as in still having *some* vulnerability to a crash where a helmet makes a difference in brain injury outcome. For this matter, about a year and a half ago I did suffer a crash that had me landing on my head. First time after maybe 1/4 million miles of cycling. Prior to that I had a crash resulting from a minor brief brain lapse where I failed to avoid a smallish known obstacle and went flying and my head missed a tree trunk by only about 10 inches (about 30 cm). - Don Klipstein ( don@misty.com)
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:04 |
|
 |
|
NoSpam
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 02:06:55 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote: >On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:13:32 +0000, Bob Masta wrote: >> Or the cyclist or biker who never wears a helmet. > >Oh, feh. This is just too much. A helmet on a freaking BICYCLE? > >You're supposed to learn how to ride the bike so that you don't fall >on your head. > Then again, I guess there's no sense protecting anything that isn't getting used anyway... <g> Bob Masta D A Q A R T A Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis http://www.daqarta.comScope, Spectrum, Spectrogram, Signal Generator Science with your sound card!
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:04 |
|
 |
|
Al
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
On 13 Aug 2007 21:20:34 -0400, DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> wrote:
> >IIRC, the cutoff for "safe" is somewhere around 60v, which determined >the rail voltage for telephone switches or something. > >I've gotten bitten by 120v before. It hurt, but caused no permanent >damage, not that I'd want to do it again. "Safe" is different than "I >got away with it" too - a little current in the wrong place is fatal, >especially if it has to cross your chest to get to ground. > >As for lower voltages, I've destroyed ICs by inserting bypass caps >without discharging them first. Safe for me, not safe for the chips.
I work around 480V, but I've heard 12V can kill if there's enough current available. I had to spend a whole day watching videos of arc-flash accidents.
When I was a kid, I got my pinkie stuck on 120V. Since it was just a trickle along one finger, it didn't hurt me, but DJ's advice is important: "Safe" is different than "I got away with it" too - a little current in the wrong place is fatal, especially if it has to cross your chest to get to ground.
-- Al in St. Lou
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:04 |
|
 |
|
Al
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:35:50 -0700, Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> wrote:
>Bob Masta wrote: >> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:01:30 -0700, phaeton <blahbleh666@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> <snip> >>> I'm not about to strip a power cord and bite down on it, obviously, >>> but he's not the first to say 'I've been bit by 110 a bunch of times. >>> It's no big deal'.. >> >> Sorta like the drunk: "I've driven home from the bar while totally >> sloshed a bunch of times. It's no big deal." >> >> Or the guy who never wears his seat belt. >> >> Or the cyclist or biker who never wears a helmet. >> >> It only has to be a "big deal" one time. >> >> But even at low voltages, there is a good reason >> to switch things off: If you work on live equipment, >> sooner or later you will slip and short something and >> let the magic smoke out. (Ask me how I know this!) <g> >> >And if it has high current capability it can have nasty interactions >with jewelry. By brother bears a scar on his wrist from a metal watch >band that got shorted (thanks to a wrench) between a truck battery and >ground. That was just 12 volts, but it stripped the skin off his wrist >underneath the segmented metal watch band.
For some reason, instead of having a twist-lock plug and jack, we have four separate plugs for one of our three-phase power supplies. For a while, I would plug and unplug without turning off the source. Then, I thought about the fact that the plug is hot when it gets part way into the jack, and I decided to take the extra precaution of powering down every time before plugging or unplugging.
-- Al in St. Lou
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:04 |
|
 |
|
Rich
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:12:14 -0500, Al in Dallas wrote: > On 13 Aug 2007 21:20:34 -0400, DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> wrote: >> >>IIRC, the cutoff for "safe" is somewhere around 60v, which determined >>the rail voltage for telephone switches or something. >> >>I've gotten bitten by 120v before. It hurt, but caused no permanent >>damage, not that I'd want to do it again. "Safe" is different than "I >>got away with it" too - a little current in the wrong place is fatal, >>especially if it has to cross your chest to get to ground. >> >>As for lower voltages, I've destroyed ICs by inserting bypass caps >>without discharging them first. Safe for me, not safe for the chips. > > I work around 480V, but I've heard 12V can kill if there's enough > current available. I had to spend a whole day watching videos of > arc-flash accidents. > > When I was a kid, I got my pinkie stuck on 120V. Since it was just a > trickle along one finger, it didn't hurt me, but DJ's advice is > important: "Safe" is different than "I got away with it" too - a > little current in the wrong place is fatal, especially if it has to > cross your chest to get to ground. I still remember the day when, at about age 3, I learned to keep my thumb out from between the prongs of the plug when I plug in the lamp.  Cheers! Rich
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:05 |
|
 |
|
John
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
>>>I still remember the day when, at about age 3, I learned to keep my thumb >>>out from between the prongs of the plug when I plug in the lamp.  Ahhh...memories. Like the time a outlet wall plate broke apart while my parents were plugging something in. Naturally, they told me to stay away from the outlets until they could buy a new plate. Naturally, I didn't. Ouch.  John
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:05 |
|
 |
|
Ross
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:01:30 -0700, phaeton <blahbleh666@hotmail.com> wrote: >Hello again from the dungeon... > >As I start to get into building line-driven power supplies and such, >where should I start REALLY being careful? 40V? 60V? 110V? I realize >that current is what does the damage, but you don't have it without >voltage. (I also realize that other factors will factor). > >What is the realistic neighborhood of where I shouldn't be grabbing >wires and/or switching out caps or resistors in a live circuit? > >The physics and shop teacher in HS talked about 110 AC Line current >like it would knock you dead instantly. An electrician that was >installing a 208v-->480v step up transformer said "110 won't hurt you >at all. It's just enough to scare you a little bit". > >I'm not about to strip a power cord and bite down on it, obviously, >but he's not the first to say 'I've been bit by 110 a bunch of times. >It's no big deal'.. > > > > >Thoughts? It depends.. In Australia, the telecommunications industry classifies 42.4Vac rms or 60V dc as Extra Low Voltage (ELV) which is generally considered the point where dangerous voltages commence. See page 12 -> http://www.howtodoit.org/acif/S008_2006.pdf
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:05 |
|
 |
|
Al
|
 Re: Electrical Safety
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:58:16 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote: >On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:12:14 -0500, Al in Dallas wrote: >> On 13 Aug 2007 21:20:34 -0400, DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> wrote: >>> >>>IIRC, the cutoff for "safe" is somewhere around 60v, which determined >>>the rail voltage for telephone switches or something. >>> >>>I've gotten bitten by 120v before. It hurt, but caused no permanent >>>damage, not that I'd want to do it again. "Safe" is different than "I >>>got away with it" too - a little current in the wrong place is fatal, >>>especially if it has to cross your chest to get to ground. >>> >>>As for lower voltages, I've destroyed ICs by inserting bypass caps >>>without discharging them first. Safe for me, not safe for the chips. >> >> I work around 480V, but I've heard 12V can kill if there's enough >> current available. I had to spend a whole day watching videos of >> arc-flash accidents. >> >> When I was a kid, I got my pinkie stuck on 120V. Since it was just a >> trickle along one finger, it didn't hurt me, but DJ's advice is >> important: "Safe" is different than "I got away with it" too - a >> little current in the wrong place is fatal, especially if it has to >> cross your chest to get to ground. > >I still remember the day when, at about age 3, I learned to keep my thumb >out from between the prongs of the plug when I plug in the lamp.  I was either plugging in or unplugging my Christmas train set. I think I was a bit older than you. I couldn't move my finger and had to pull away my arm, IIRC. -- Al in St. Lou
|
| 29 Dec 2007, 17:05 |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 24 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|