"robb" <some@where.on.net> wrote in message
news:13qoip0fdq0muc3@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Arfa Daily" <arfa.daily@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:MvVqj.4991$nG4.2323@newsfe6-win.ntli.net...
>>
>> "robb" <some@where.on.net> wrote in message
>> news:13qma34qvgsf357@corp.supernews.com...
>> > Silicon cured, CRT installed and tested.
>> > Sorry no fireworks or shooting flames

>> >
>> > Problems:
>> > ==========
>> > The display is skewed and the intensity and focus are off.
>> > I was not expecting te new CRT to have hyper-intensity
> troubles.
>> > That is... from no visible trace to oversaturated CRT
> brightness
>> > is a very small range of knob motion maybe a 1/4-1/3 of he
> full
>> > turn .
>> > And the focus is very sensitive, touch sensitive ? was not
>> > before.
>>
>> It sounds to me like this replacement CRT might not be quite as
> 'compatible'
>> as you had hoped ...

Maybe that's part of the reason that
> the PDA lead
>> was not long enough to fit in your chassis i.e. to stop such a
> substitution
>> taking place. As far as the trace being 'skewed' do you mean
> that it is not
>> perfectly horizontal, or that it is trapezoidally distorted ?
> If the former,
>> then most decent 'scopes have a trace rotation control
> somewhere. As far as
>> the brightness / focus issues go, that is likely to be quite
> difficult to
>> resolve, and will probably require changes to be made to the
> component
>> values in the resistor chains providing the biasing voltages to
> the various
>> electrodes. I would suggest that you will not get too far with
> that, without
>> having schematics for both the 'scope that you've put the tube
> in, and the
>> one that it came out of, so that you can make comparisons of
> values and
>> expected voltages. Just as a matter of interest, are the quoted
> deflection
>> sensitivities for both tubes the same ?
>>
>> Good luck with it - I think you'ree going to need it, but it's
> nice to see
>> that a sense of experimentation still exists out there - it's
> the sort of
>> thing that I would have been playing with 30 years ago ...
>>
>
> Hello Arfa,
> It is a Tek scope.
> There are lots of pots for adjusting the CRT params.
>
> The CRT was replaced with its **reverse** compatible replacement
> P/N.
>
> That is, typically one replaces the earlier model CRT with the
> newer model and i have done the reverse. I replaced the newer
> model with the earlier model. Unless it was a "one way
> compatibility" then technically it should work.
>
> The HV lead was longer in newer models because of physical change
> to the Flyback/HV multiplier transformer and orientation. The
> earlier model machines had an HV Jack on an 3" HV lead coming off
> the Flyback the newer models have te HV Jack on the Flyback
> directly.
>
> So you need just 1" (2.5 cm) more HV lead to make it there.
>
> Hopefully i can cure problems with the adjustments, as I do not
> really want to modify the original PCB /schematic values.
>
> Thanks for help and ideas Arfa,
> robb
>
Hmmmm. Sometimes, compatible substitution *is* a one-way street. If the
parameters of the two tubes were sufficiently similar, I would not have
expected there to be a huge difference in the external setups, or for the
operation of the user controls to become 'bunched' as you described. There
are a couple of Tek 'scope experts who pop up on here from time to time who
would be much better qualified to advise you on the specifics of your
problems than I, so hopefully one of them will dive in to help you shortly !
Arfa